http://myblimpisbigger.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] myblimpisbigger.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] tvk2011-09-19 12:40 pm
Entry tags:

Two [Video/Backdated to Event]: In Which Klaus Has Feelings Because Plurk Wanted It

[After talking to Ingrid, Klaus is feeling more than a little bit... off. For a man usually utterly unflappable, this sudden influx of ~feelings~ isn't usual or welcome.

He isn't a bad parent. He worked for years to make sure that his son was independent and strong. He did his very best to ensure that when, finally, one of the assassins actually hit their mark, Gil would be able to run the country efficiently. Wasn't that the important thing? Keeping Gil alive was far more important than keeping him happy. Dead children can't adore their fathers.

Only now, he's not so sure.]


I have a question for you, Prospero. An entirely hypothetical question.

Say there is a man. He is in charge of a country -- a large, volatile, war-torn country. He was welcomed as a savior when he first took power but almost immediately fell out of favor when he actually began to make decisions and it was discovered that he could not, in fact, please everyone. This man has a son.

He is, naturally, worried for his son's safety. He himself is the victim of several assassination attempts a month. He can handle them. A young child could not. Is it therefore acceptable for him to sever his ties with his child and keep the relationship a secret in order to protect the son and ensure that he grows up independent of the stress of being the heir to the throne, as it were? Especially considering that he did intend to tell him when he was old enough to handle it?

[Entirely hypothetical. Yes. SO HYPOTHETICAL BITCHES DON'T KNOW.]

[Video]

[identity profile] toomanypetals.livejournal.com 2011-09-19 04:45 pm (UTC)(link)
[YEAH RIGHT]

...You have a son?

[identity profile] toomanypetals.livejournal.com 2011-09-19 04:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Hn.

[He just... finds it interesting? idk.]

As for your question-- I wouldn't know. I have no family.

[identity profile] toomanypetals.livejournal.com 2011-09-19 04:55 pm (UTC)(link)
...Tch. If it was me, I'd rather know right off. If he grows up independent of his responsibilities, and the dangers thereof, how is he expected to take them on when the time comes?

[identity profile] genius-idiot.livejournal.com 2011-09-19 04:56 pm (UTC)(link)
[Kaiji knows everyone's been spilling their guts out lately, so he wonders how hypothetical this is. That's not going to stop him from answering honestly.]

I think it's unfair for the kid not to know, whether you're the one who's raising him or not. He'll grow up with his own life, his own aspirations, only to have them taken away and replaced by a life he may not want.

[identity profile] toomanypetals.livejournal.com 2011-09-19 05:01 pm (UTC)(link)
...So it's not a problem.

[Pause.]

Are you unhappy that you didn't get to spend time with him growing up?

[identity profile] genius-idiot.livejournal.com 2011-09-19 05:10 pm (UTC)(link)
Should he? How can you be so sure? It's not like he'd be raised in that environment. It'd be one hell of a shock. It's a shitload of pressure to put on a kid.

[identity profile] toomanypetals.livejournal.com 2011-09-19 05:11 pm (UTC)(link)
And a strong feeling of "this is where I belong", and seeing his father as someone to look up to and trust.

[Yeah no this plan doesn't fly with him.]

Speaking as someone who didn't have parents-- I would've rather had them and been in more danger. But tch. That's me.

[identity profile] genius-idiot.livejournal.com 2011-09-19 05:45 pm (UTC)(link)
So why are you posing this "hypothetical" situation when the damage is already done? It sounds like you've already made the decision and what's done is done.

[identity profile] toomanypetals.livejournal.com 2011-09-19 09:21 pm (UTC)(link)
It's time and interactions neither of you will ever be able to get back. Not saying it's all bad-- it probably worked. But family makes you stronger.

[WHO KNOWS. Kanda cherishes his makeshift not-really family very much, okay.]

[identity profile] toomanypetals.livejournal.com 2011-09-19 09:31 pm (UTC)(link)
Family doesn't have to be related by blood.

[He really is a horrible father.]

[video]

[identity profile] needsteaplz.livejournal.com 2011-09-19 10:06 pm (UTC)(link)
[You do realize when someone says its hypothetical, it obviously means they're talking about themselves or someone they know.]

I believe a child has a right to know about their birth parents. For this case, if the son knows his background, he has a better grasp with what's expected of him. How he decides to approach them is something only he can decide.

[identity profile] nomammano.livejournal.com 2011-09-19 10:15 pm (UTC)(link)
Well then how would we end up with great fighting masters or kings without powerful secret fathers abandoning their sons. It gives them a great destiny!

[Video]

[identity profile] techno-logical.livejournal.com 2011-09-19 10:19 pm (UTC)(link)
[Yeeeeeeep, COMPLETELY HYPOTHETICAL.

Anyway, have a line facing April, Klaus.]


No, I don't think it's fair. People have a right to know who their family is and it would've better prepared him for what's to come if he knew.

[identity profile] toomanypetals.livejournal.com 2011-09-19 10:34 pm (UTC)(link)
There's a term we have on my world-- it's called "parenting". Maybe you've heard of it.

[BURN]

You don't have to coddle someone to raise them. Hell, even if you leave them in the exact same environment you grew up in, they won't walk away with the same knowledge you do. That's why elders are important-- to teach the young the mistakes and experiences that they went through.

[He knows this...abstractly. The only elder he respects even a little isn't really respectable.]

Page 1 of 4